01
The Safeguards Are Banned
Cities must allow low-barrier PSH wherever homes or hotels are allowed. As a condition of approval, they cannot add spacing, operating rules, or permit hurdles beyond those for an ordinary apartment.
Protect our Schools and Neighborhoods. Fix HB 2266.
We support compassionate housing solutions for those in need. But low-barrier, drug tolerant housing does not belong near our schools, parks, and homes. Demand that our legislature restore reasonable local safeguards for Permanent Supportive Housing (PSH).
What is "Permanent Supportive Housing"?
Homes for Drug Abuse, with No Treatment Required.
Permanent Supportive Housing is sold as housing with wraparound services for people with disabilities. In reality they are low-barrier facilities for people with major behavioral problems, uncontrolled drug abuse, and criminal records. No treatment is required.
Learn more about what the reality of PSHThe Legislature overrode local safeguards
The safety rules for PSH are gone.
Low-barrier PSH does not require sobriety or treatment. HB 2266 deliberately banned the buffers, hearings, and operating rules cities used to keep it out of the wrong places and to require safe operation.
02
Pre-Permit Review Is Gone
Cities can no longer require a public meeting or hearing before approval. Staff sign off. A shelter meeting, if any, comes after the permit is issued. Permanent Supportive Housing does not even get that notice.
03
PSH Gets No School Buffer
The only school-distance tool left is a 500-foot negotiation, and it covers emergency shelters, not Permanent Supportive Housing. Mercer Island repealed its 600-foot buffer to comply.
04
Working Families Pay to Build It
Developers can skip affordable units by paying about $25 a square foot, then pass that cost on to working people buying homes — about $25,000 more for a typical unit. On Mercer Island that is an estimated $31 million. With grants, about $102 million to finance low-barrier PSH.
The 2027 session is the window for action
Demand that your legislators fix the law.
Organized "housing first" advocates created these mandates. Organized constituents can fix them. Contact your State Senator and two State Representatives now and demand a public commitment to corrective legislation in 2027.
01
Contact your Washington legislators
Copy and personalize the sample message, then use the official Washington State Legislature website to find your district's Senator and two Representatives.
Find and contact your legislatorsOpens the official Washington State Legislature website in a new window.
Sample message
Subject
Will you commit to corrective HB 2266 legislation in 2027?
Message
Dear Senator/Representative [Last Name], I am your constituent in [city or community]. I support compassionate housing solutions, but HB 2266 went too far by stripping cities and residents of reasonable tools to address the siting and operation of low-barrier Permanent Supportive Housing. Washington law makes support services voluntary while limiting local safeguards near schools, child care sites, parks, and homes. Communities should not be forced to wait for preventable impacts before they are allowed a voice. Please publicly commit to sponsor or support corrective legislation in the 2027 session that restores reasonable siting buffers, public notice and hearings, school and child care coordination, transparent impact reporting, and options for regional collaboration. Please tell me specifically what action you will take before the 2027 session begins. I will be watching this issue and sharing your response with my community. Sincerely, [Your name] [Your address or legislative district]
02
Sign the petition
Join over 1,780 verified supporters demanding sensible housing policy.
Add your name03
Share the campaign
Forward this site to neighbors, HOAs, and local businesses to maintain momentum ahead of the legislative session.
Already landing on neighborhoods
Low-barrier PSH is already burdening Washington communities
Bellevue, Seattle, and Kirkland show what happens when a single site concentrates people who are not required to be sober or in treatment. Surging police calls, assaults, a fatal overdose that went unnoticed for days, and placement near schools over the objections of parents. That is the model being forced on every community in Washington.
Bellevue — Eastgate
Plymouth Crossing
Bellevue's first PSH, beside a men's shelter. Police calls have surged.
Community impact
- Building calls: 5 in the second half of 2023, 148 in 2024.
- Nearby calls rose from 609 to 1,082.
- Neighbors report open drug use and camping.
Seattle — Rainier Valley
Hobson Place
177 studios. This address led Seattle in misdemeanor assaults.
Community impact
- 34 misdemeanor assaults in 2022, most of any Seattle address.
- A fatal fentanyl overdose went unnoticed for six days.
- Robbery, assault, and open drug use inside.
Kirkland — near Northup Way
Sheila Stanton Place
101 low-barrier homes near schools, bought before a public meeting.
Community impact
- Near three schools and a daycare. Parents sued.
- Sobriety is not required. Treatment is optional.
- Some nearby businesses are leaving, citing risk.
What drives PSH mandates
These mandates did not appear out of nowhere
A well-organized network is investing money, technical expertise, legal pressure, and political endorsements to remove local barriers to its preferred housing model. Residents who want safeguards must organize with equal clarity and persistence.
Read the exposeOur legislative platform
A practical fix for the 2027 session
We are calling on the State Legislature to amend HB 2266 in the 2027 session to restore local, community-led planning:
1
Restore Siting Safeguards
Allow cities to maintain reasonable buffers between emergency housing, PSH, and sensitive areas like homes, schools, licensed daycares, and community centers.
2
Mandate Public Hearings
Ensure the public's voice is preserved by requiring public hearings before siting and approving low-barrier housing projects.
3
Enable Regional Collaboration
Explicitly allow cities to meet housing targets through interlocal agreements to develop emergency housing in appropriate, supported locations.
4
Small City Exemptions
Provide exemptions for communities with populations under 30,000, similar to the framework established in SB 5184.
Campaign updates and news
Momentum for a state-level fix
Petition Launched & Rapid Growth
We launched the petition after the state forced Mercer Island to allow PSH in all residential areas. The community immediately rallied, gathering over 340 signatures in the first 24 hours.
Campaign Meets with 41st District Representatives
As the petition passed 500 supporters, campaign organizers met with State Representatives My-Linh Thai and Janice Zahn to explain how HB 2266 restricts local siting decisions and operational safety requirements. Both representatives accepted petition materials and expressed interest in continuing the discussion.
Media Coverage Draws Legislative Responses
After the Mercer Island Reporter covered the petition, Senator Lisa Wellman publicly committed to supporting reasonable adjustments in the next legislative session, and Representative Janice Zahn emphasized local and regional collaboration. The campaign also urged the City Council not to adopt HB 2266 provisions ahead of the 2028 state deadline.
Council Approves PSH Code Changes
Residents spoke against adopting the HB 2266 provisions, but the Mercer Island City Council unanimously approved the Comprehensive Plan amendments. The vote reinforced that restoring siting safeguards and public input will require action by the State Legislature.
Senator Wellman Commits to Corrective Legislation
Senator Lisa Wellman's office committed to request a Senate work session on HB 2266's effects on smaller, geographically constrained cities, begin drafting corrective legislation with community and stakeholder input, and host an in-person listening session for 41st District residents.
Student Safety Case Presented to School Board
During public comment, the campaign asked the School Board to support mandatory district consultation for PSH proposed near schools and full state funding for any additional security measures. Board members discussed the concerns but took no action.